Newsletter Issue #736
January 6th, 2014THIS WEEK’S TECH NIGHT OWL RADIO UPDATE
Can a valid argument by made for buying an inexpensive Android smartphone for most people? Sure, you can get an iPhone 4S free with a two-year contract from the major U.S. carriers, with a slightly complicated payment variation from T-Mobile that turns their price into an installment plan. You can get an iPhone 5c for $99 on a similar arrangement, and sometimes there are deals that allow you to save some money.
But what if you don’t want to deal with carrier contracts or two-year loans to pay off that fancy new smartphone? Well, perhaps the Moto G, at $179 unlocked, might be a possible contender if your needs are modest. It’s not the most powerful handset out there, but it offers a near-pristine Android experience. That’s a refreshing change when you compare the Motorola to a typical Samsung, which is stuffed to the gills with often useless junkware.
That doesn’t mean a Moto G is an honest-to-goodness iPhone alternative. But for those who mostly care about making phone calls, doing some messaging and emailing and maybe running an app or two, it might be good enough. All right, I can’t see where Motorola is not making much profit from it, but since it puts you into Google’s ecosystem, they hope to earn something from the targeted ads.
In any case, on this week’s episode of The Tech Night Owl LIVE, we featured outspoken commentator Peter Cohen, Managing Editor for iMore, who spoke on the state of the tech industry in 2013 and 2014, with an emphasis on Apple. Inc. He discussed the prospects for 4K or Ultra HD, and whether Apple will consider building a TV set and/or a smartwatch for release later this year.
You also heard from author and commentator Kirk McElhearn, Macworld’s “iTunes Guy,” who described his experiences dealing with satellite-based Internet at his new home in the UK. He also offered the down and dirty details about his experiences comparing iOS and Android as the owner of a Moto G smartphone. As I pointed out at the start of this article, the product has the potential to succeed with a specific audience with modest expectations. He also talked about the value of the Mac Pro, and whether you really have to pay that alleged “Apple Tax” to buy one. But I’ll have more to say on Apple’s pricing in the next article.
On this week’s episode of our other radio show, The Paracast: Gene and Chris introduce long-time investigative journalist and author Barry Chamish. Barry is best known for his Israeli number one bestseller, “Who Murdered Yitzhak Rabin.” His research on a bizarre Israeli UFO wave led to five episodes of “Sightings.” His work led to a book called “Return of the Giants.” And, whether you accept the murder of JFK as a possible conspiracy, did you ever consider whether the death of his son, JFK Jr., in a plane crash was also the result of a conspiracy? You’ll hear about all this and more in this wide-ranging interview.
Now Shipping! The Official Paracast T-Shirt! We’re taking orders direct from our new Official Paracast Store, where you can place your order and pay with a major credit card or PayPal. The shirts come in white, 100% cotton, and feature The Paracast logo on the front. The rear emblem states: “Separating Signal From Noise.” We’ve also added a huge selection of additional special custom-imprinted merchandise for fans of our show.
The story continues. Macs are expensive and PCs are cheap. If you just want a basic computer to get online, run Word, and handle email, you can do perfectly fine with an entry-level Dell, and I see them for as little as $329.99 at the company’s online store.
Compare that, they tell you, to the tiny Mac mini at $599. There’s no possible comparison. Why spend the extra money for a luxury “niche” product anyway? After all, despite the problems with Windows 8, the majority of the computing world still prefers Windows.
Anyway, that’s the argument, one that I have examined over and over again over the years with essentially the same result. When identically equipped — and sometimes that’s a bit of a stretch — the Mac and the Windows PC are pretty close in price. Sometimes the Mac is cheaper, and sometimes the PC is cheaper. But not by much except at the very high-end.
Now about that $329.99 Dell, an Inspiron 660s minitower. It’s easy to say that this product is proof positive that the Mac mini is overpriced, but not quite. The basic Inspiron comes with a dual-core Intel Pentium processor. Did I say Pentium? Unfortunately, this PC, from Dell’s home or consumer product line, can’t be customized when it comes to the hardware. There are models with more powerful processors and larger drives, priced at $429.99 and $579.99. Suddenly the price difference seems less significant.
A more meaningful comparison is a note-book. The cheapest 11-inch MacBook Air, a thin and light model, is $999. Among the listed Dell Inspiron Ultrabooks, the home versions aren’t being offered with solid state drives (at least none were apparent in the online listings I consulted) because the company probably wants to make them cheap. The entry-level work Ultrabook is an XPS 11 2-in-1, meaning it has a touch display and a swivel screen. The cheapest version sells for $1,149.99 but only has 2GB of RAM and an 80GB solid state drive. In contrast the basic MacBook Air offers 4GB of RAM and a 128GB drive. To me, storage space is still inadequate, but we’re trying to compare two products that are meant to compete in the same space. Granted a touchscreen is more expensive, but it’s also true that they aren’t getting the love from customers.
This is a cursory comparison, but I’ll assume the processor and networking hardware is satisfactory for both. So we end up here with a Dell note-book with a starting price that’s $150 more than the starting price of the cheapest MacBook Air.
In the all-in-one space, once again I had to go to Dell’s work-oriented store to find a 27-inch PC. The very cheapest XPS 2720 has a starting price of $1,599 compared to $1,799 for a 27-inch iMac. The specs are close enough not to be significant in general use, though the Dell does offer something significant not found in the iMac, an optical drive. The only productivity software offered is a 1 month trial version of Microsoft Office 365. A full license is $219.99, compared to free for iWork. Granted, Office is a far more powerful productivity suite, but most home users, and many small businesses, don’t need the extra features.
What it comes down to here is that, once again, Macs are priced very competitively with PCs that have similar configurations. Sometimes the Mac will be more expensive, sometimes the PC. But the difference is not usually significant. Yes, you can find cheaper gear aplenty in the Windows world, but that’s not an area where Apple will participate, since there’s not much profit to be had. It’s also true that there is a far wider range of configurations on the other side of the tracks, and you may find the exact components that suit your needs in situations where there’s no comparable Mac.
Indeed, if you prefer OS X regardless, there are well-known tricks to create what has been known as a “hackintosh,” a PC that has been tricked out to run Apple’s OS. You may save some money in the process, though compatibility may be hit or miss unless you are careful in your selection of the raw components. It’s also quite possible a future OS X upgrade will break your carefully configured system.
But you can certainly save time and aggravation buying a genuine Mac. Sure, if your needs are very modest, the cheap PC box you can find at a Walmart may be perfectly satisfactory. I can’t tell you how well it will hold up under sustained use, since, when the warranty expires, repairs will cost far more than replacing the box with a new one.
When it comes to high-end workstations, the Mac Pro is clearly significantly cheaper than even a roughly comparable PC. That nasty fact has been true for a very long time, by the way. For some reason, Apple manages to make expensive gear more affordable than the competition.
As I said in an earlier commentary, the Apple Tax on a Mac Pro is really a Tax Refund. When you look at the rest of the lineup, and compare it honestly to a similarly outfitted PC, you’ll get what you pay for, and the Mac is definitely not expensive when examined fairly. But this is nothing different from what I’ve said for years.
DID OS X MAVERICKS HIT A ROADBLOCK?
Other than freaking out Microsoft, which continues to charge up to $199 for a copy of the latest version of Windows, making OS X Mavericks free was considered a sure way to encourage quick adoption by Mac users. Indeed, for the first few weeks, it did appear that loads of Mac users had downloaded and installed the upgrade.
According to a published report, however, it does appear that the popularity of Mavericks may have hit the skids, while the user base of OS X Snow Leopard, circa 2009, remains reasonably constant at 19.5%. After hitting 32% in November, according to Net Applications, which tracks online traffic, Mavericks “merely” increased to 37% in December. This, according to the article in question, must be a troublesome development. You see, some 22% of Mac users are still running Mountain Lion and 16.3% have stayed with Lion.
The article uses the dreaded “fragmentation” word to create fear, but the numbers require a more linear analysis. You see, the rapid growth of Mavericks the first few weeks would largely have consisted of early adopters. The numbers in December likely consist largely of those who set up new Macs on which OS 10.9 was preloaded. I’m guessing, but this appears to make sense.
The real question is how many of that 63% of remaining Mac users can actually upgrade to Mavericks. It’s fair to say that a large number of Snow Leopard users are off the list, and not just because they need to run Rosetta for legacy PowerPC apps. The hardware may just not be compatible. The same may be true for some proportion of Lion users. So the only way they can get Mavericks is to buy a new — or at least a newer — Mac. Otherwise they cannot upgrade.
The larger portion of potential Mavericks users is that 19.5% running Mountain Lion, since Mavericks works on the same hardware. So you’d expect that number to erode over the next few months far more quickly than 10.6 and 10.7 users.
I hope you see the logic here. There is a hard number in the current Mac user base who cannot upgrade. End of story. It has nothing to do with the comfort level or the reliability of OS 10.9. Unfortunately, the article in question, which isn’t getting a link for obvious reasons, doesn’t attempt to explain the reasons for the slowing adoption rate. It’s all about the alleged consequences, the supposed fragmentation that can hurt the advance of the Mac platform.
I could, of course, point out that the uptake of Windows 8 and 8.1 is just beginning to exceed that of Windows Vista, which had its worldwide rollout in 2007. More than a third of Windows users are sticking with XP, first released in 2001. That disparity has to present all sorts of complications for developers who want to reach the widest possible audience yet take advantage of the platform’s latest features and enhanced security.
It’s also important to point out that online surveys of this sort are, at best, approximations. They may vary from test to test, and only tally the “user agent” information transmitted by the browser, which would include the name of the app, the version and the OS. With Mac users, you assume the larger percentage of people are going get online soon after setting up a new Mac, or installing an OS upgrade. Many Windows computers never get online because they are used for businesses that speak strictly to a local network, or a private business network that will never register with Net Applications. Indeed, it may well be that there are more XP users than you might imagine as a result, simply because these computers, which may also simply run a cash register, never make an online transaction. I think of a nearby dry cleaner, for example.
Unfortunately, without actually taking a direct user survey that has a proper mix of Mac users, it’s going to be hard to determine the meaning behind any given online metric. It’s a lot easier to post a sensational headline, particularly when it appears to portend bad news.
THE FINAL WORD
The Tech Night Owl Newsletter is a weekly information service of Making The Impossible, Inc.
Publisher/Editor: Gene Steinberg
Managing Editor: Grayson Steinberg
Marketing and Public Relations: Barbara Kaplan
Worldwide Licensing: Sharon Jarvis
Print This Issue
The only reason I don’t upgrade to Mavericks is that I’m afraid that it won’t play nice with my other software if I knew that it would upgrade. Many third-party programs cost upwards of two or $300 that’s not a risk I’m willing to take.
@David Evans, You should check with the publishers of your most important apps to see about Mavericks compatibility. Some third-party apps have built-in update mechanisms, where you get a notice that an update is ready to install.
Peace,
Gene
@David Evans, My recommendation is don’t “upgrade” based on the fact that in my experience, Mavericks has SERIOUS problems, including a tendency to wipe out external HDs and glacial Finder and Mail listing/sorting performances. For verification — consult the web. People are screaming.
In fact, I am now looking for way to return to ML.
The problems with its core OS suggest to me that there may be really deep-seated problems at Apple. Have too many of their top people moved to iOS, to Google, and other highly energized companies? Given that the OS is core to the company’s ability to offer a well integrated tech package for work, the major failures of Mavericks have bode poorly for Apple, and have me asking myself if Apple is to be my future platform, or not. Maybe it is time for me to move again? IMO, the current problems with Mavericks are not tolerable in a professional work setting, i.e., given the loss of data and time. The last time I reached this level of frustration with an OS, I moved from Windows to OS9. I.e., the level of frustration is Apple has gotten very high.
If you go to Mavericks, make sure that you have backups that include a facile means of returning to ML without data loss — AND DO NOT CONNECT THOSE EXTERNAL HDs TO A MAVERICKS MACHINE — they could get wiped out, like mine and those of many other people.
The only significant public issue about losing data related to a problem with Western Digital’s software, provided with their external drives. That problem has since been resolved with their update. If it happened to you, I understand your frustration. But those who did do the update, or didn’t use WD’s software, shouldn’t be having any problems as of now.
Peace,
Gene
@Gene Steinberg, ABSOLUTELY NOT TRUE!!!! Case in point — It wiped out my 3TB external Seagate.
@David Stelly, Sorry to hear that, but that you have a problem doesn’t mean everyone has the problem.
Peace,
Gene
@Gene Steinberg, Are you paid by Apple? By your tone,
it certainly sounds that way.
@chogyam, Welcome to the world of the absurd.
Peace,
Gene
@David Stelly, Curious about this. When you first set up your Seagate did you throw out anything that came installed on the disk and then reformatted it yourself? I’ve been doing that for years even before this recent issue. I don’t trust those HD companies, or their software. I know a wiped and reformatted disk has always worked flawlessly for me.
@MacRaven, Sorry to say, but I began using it over a year ago so I don’t recall for sure, but I am pretty sure that I formatted it then began using it for TimeMachine. I did not remove any software from my MBPro, which very probably has WD software on it (unfortunately).
DS
@David Stelly, Thanks for the heads up. I’m in no hurry to upgrade. The main reason I wanted to was to take advantage of the FCP X upgrade. I own several WD Hard Drives and would have to kill myself if they got wiped out all of the sudden. So to me, it isn’t worth the risk. Plus as I mentioned, I depend on several 3rd party software programs to do my work. I’d hate to find out that they are no longer working after the upgrade. I’ll probably wait several months, or even over a year before considering the upgrade. By then, all of the bugs should be worked out and the 3rd party developers may have caught up with the new OS.
I don’t usually do the OS X upgrade until the third update. My MacBook Air came with Mountain Lion. I did not like how the virtual memory manager was grabbing a big chunks of gigabytes for swap files. Under Mavericks, use of the swap files have stabilized to be around one gigabyte in size. In addition, the sleep image file size is greatly reduced. While I am experiencing a few issues with Mavericks (growing pains), it is good to see the disk free space not dwindling quickly.
My older Mac running Lion has not been upgraded and I am in no rush to.
I have about 15 computers in this department that will upgrade eventually, probably this Spring after most bugs are worked out. But my 3 computers for home use were all quickly upgraded to Mavericks except the 4th Mac, an old reliable laptop too old for anything but Snow Leopard (which I don’t mind because though Mav has some definite improvements I needed, SL has the most logically laid out user interface I’ve used so far).
Business is a different animal, have to hold back longer because software issues are more critical. Will do one first in March or April then if all goes well, do all the others. You have to remember Macs never dominated on the business front but now that you do see many more of them in Business settings (and they are included in the percent of total Macs on Earth that are or are not updated), that cautious business update lag will take up a larger percent than in the past. As Macs grow even more in business the lag to update will be even more obvious after the initial rush to update from the private users subsides.
Again, the Star Trek theory holds sway over me: The even-numbered ones are the good ones. Considering all the issues I ran across with AD/OD compatibility in 10.7 that didn’t get fixed until 10.8, I’ll wait out 10.9. I’ll let the explorers take the arrows, thank you very much.
There’s also the standard argument that it ain’t broke, so why fix it? I upgraded my roomate from 10.6 to Mavericks on her Mac mini because of some software she uses that actually required 10.7 or better. But my Mom is still quite happy with her 10.6 machine, sending e-mails and surfing the web, so why upgrade (especially considering the stories I’ve heard about Mavericks’ Mail).
@Peter, The Mail issues have been fixed with the 10.9.1 update that was recently pushed out.
The iMac 20″ which could come up to Lion must stay at Snow Leopard until I can figure out how to translate many hundreds of legacy AppleWorks documents that refuse to open with any iWorks apps (in spite of assurances to the contrary). Considering the numbers of businesses that used AppleWorks, I’m surprised Apple Inc abandoned it in such a cavalier manner. I don’t care how many bells and whistles the latest wizz-bang from Jony may have, old ‘stuff’ is too valuable to walk away from. There should be a whole division at Cupertino devoted to keeping legacy information accessible or are they into book burning up there?
The MacBookPro is lingering on Lion because it just works…. I’ve contemplated updating but the potential for more grief than advantage inclines me toward waiting until they de-flea Mavericks, which maybe will never happen because “if it ain’t broke, fix it until it is!”
@Kiwiiano, Clearly, from your comments and others with similar situations, the number of Snow Leopard users will erode very slowly over time, but it’s not Apple’s alternative to the Windows XP situation by any means. Lion users will face the double dilemma of possibly incompatible hardware and perhaps software. But a larger number of Mountain Lion users, without hardware issues, should be able to upgrade. But that also assumes the apps they use will work correctly in Mavericks. It’s not a given by any means.
Peace,
Gene
@Gene Steinberg,
Clearly Lion and Mountain Lion users would be advised to do a clean install of Mavericks on a separate partition or external drive and run it in parallel for some time before committing to the new OS.
Which begs the question “What do the developers who trial the new OS’s actually do?” It oft surprises me that so many problems seem to evade identification until a new OS is unleashed on the Great Unwashed. ;^)
Another factor that is not considered by the “Technical Analysts” is that Apple’s Hardware has longer life. Though some the older Macs are not capable of running Mavericks, they are more than adequate to run the run of the mill applications– Mail, Safari, iWork etc., that are good enough in the age of the Cloud Computing!!!
@Viswakarma, Also, even a three or four-year-old Mac may be quite fast enough. Speed improvements are very incremental. The largest improvement on the recent iMacs is the result of more availability of the Fusion and full solid state drives. That can cause a bigger boost than than the tiny processor improvements. You see those Macworld reviews, for example, which show maybe a 5-10% speed boost, which is barely detectable except for long rendering tasks or with a stopwatch.
The larger performance improvement is found on the new iPhones and iPads with the A7 64-bit processor, which are roughly twice as fast as older models.
Peace,
Gene
Of possible interest:
http://www.macobserver.com/tmo/article/wall-streets-insane-treatment-of-apple-google-and-amazon-demonstrated-in-9?utm_campaign=tmo_home_sidebar
@Ted Schroeder, They have some really smart people over there. That’s why I’m always delighted to have them on the radio show.
Peace,
Gene
I’m still with 10.6.8 because of legacy apps and, frankly, because all I need for work (I am a sci-tech developer) is still available and runs very well on SL. If I were Apple, especially in the post-Jobs era, I would try to hold on to as many customers as possible, and be extra nice to them.
First, I would ensure that security updates are available to 10.6.8 users for as long as SL market share is around 20% (yes, even if inaccurately measured). This would require, what, 2-3 people at Apple?
Second, I would allow SL users to run SL in 10.9 through easy-to-use virtualization. Sometimes (definitely for me) the issue is not so much day-to-day use of legacy apps, but rather reliable access to legacy files through legacy apps. I have thousands of old useful files that the 10.9 version of an app can no longer open, but the SL version still can (think of old Office files). Please don’t expect me to “pre-convert” them before upgrading OS and apps! If I could open, even with a huge penalty hit because of virtualization, all those old ClarisWorks, WordPerfect, Canvas, PowerPoint98, Eudora, etc., files, and take them to a “modern” state on an as-needed basis, moving to 10.9 would be a no-brainer.
@Mike Shore,
Thinks: considering the numbers of legacy documents that must exist, countless millions if not billions, you’d expect some bright sparks to have developed software to bulk retrieve and at least convert them to PDFs or some format readable into the foreseeable future. I had considered sitting down and opening my thousands of Apple- & Clarisworks documents (mostly WP & SS, a few DB & DR) and saving to PDF, but the clumsy steps required* and my appalling ignorance of any of the automation procedures that may lurk in the shadows of OSX meant that I chickened out….Siiiiigh!!
( * Just acquiring legacy versions of AW and CW to open the older docs was the first challenge!!)
I have the mid-2007 Intel-inside iMAC that is Mavericks compatible. I upgraded to Snow Leopard bundle after it had been out for at least six months, probably 10.6.4. This time, due to concerns about performance, I want to upgrade from 2=>4GB RAM first, and wait for about 10.9.4. I guess this makes me a cautious adopter.
I understand why Apple wants as many as possible to move up because in my business we wish for the same thing.
Most Macs didn’t come preloaded with Mavericks in December, only the configured-to-order machines. The very last week of December we started seeing standard machines coming with Mavericks.
The biggest thing holding the business world back are a few bugs, such as VPN issues, as well as compatibility with enterprise technologies.
I’d say we’re going to see the next large jump after the release of 10.9.2.
I am a video producer. I have thousands upon thousands of mov, flv, avi, and mp4 files.
I have been a Mac user for a very very long time. I tried Mavericks for about a week.
My workflow was utterly destroyed. None, NONE of my video library files played
in the NEW apple video player. Not even the mp4 files. Not the right codec.
As a video producer, I HATE MAVERICKS.
so, I reverted to Mountain Lion. I will never use Mavericks until
the day I die. My trust in Apple has been diminished.
The latest version of FCP has become a childs toy.
Makes me sad. Oh well. Steve is dead.