What Price Lion?
December 29th, 2010Apple has gotten a bad rap for high OS upgrade prices. It all started in the early days when you could download the latest and greatest Mac OS free of charge, or just get your blank floppies copied at a local dealer or user group. If you wanted the full package with all the user manuals, you did have to buy the retail package, but few bothered.
One day, back in the days of Mac OS 7, Apple decided to stop giving the crown jewels away, except for the usual maintenance fixer-uppers. Although Mac users complained bitterly about the inability to get what used to be available free, it’s not as if Microsoft gave away copies of Windows.
So Mac users became accustomed, grudgingly of course, to shelling out $99 for Apple’s latest and greatest operating system.
Then came Mac OS X.
In the fall of 2000, you were afforded the “privilege” of buying a copy of the Mac OS X Public Beta for just $29.95. In responses to protests about then having to pay the full $129 retail price for the “final release,” sometimes known as 10.0, Apple relented and allowed you to deduct what you paid for the Public Beta.
Well, that made sense, until Steve Jobs admitted, during the official March 2001 rollout media event, that the first official release of Mac OS X was meant for early adopters and power users. Yes, my friends, it was still a beta, feature limited to the extent that you couldn’t even burn a CD.
When 10.1 arrived, which was largely a bug fix and feature restoration release, Apple’s $19.95 shipping and handling fee was the source of loads of complaints. Why should it cost so much to mail a CD and a tiny booklet? Apple must be cleaning up. Of course, you could also go to your favorite Apple dealer and get a copy — or two or three as I did — at no cost, so this wasn’t such a big issue.
From then on, the reference releases of Mac OS X remained $129 for 10.2 through 10.5, but then came Snow Leopard.
According to Apple, Snow Leopard wasn’t so much a feature release in the sense of sporting 200 or 300 flashy goodies. Instead, it was meant as a slimmer, trimmer OS, without the code for PowerPC Macs, which were no longer supported. New features were intended to create the foundation to allow developers to build more powerful and speedier apps. That is, when they got around to adding support for the new features, and that situation is still very much a work in progress.
Since Snow Leopard wasn’t intended as a full feature release, Apple exacted a modest $29 for a copy for 10.5 users. If you are running 10.4, there is a special Mac Box Set, the latest version of which, recently released, adds iLife ’11 and iWork ’09 to the mix, and sells for the standard $129.
That takes us to Lion.
It’s widely expected that Mac OS X Lion will cost $129, same as the standard issue Mac OS X upgrade. Or maybe not. You see, Apple has been busy reducing the prices of consumer grade software of late, so the latest and greatest iLife is now $49, rather than $79. Does that signal a trend?
Now I fully expect that Lion will sport the usual 200 to 300 brand new features, a few of which will be sexy enough to entice you to buy the upgrade however it’s priced. But I do not include much of that iOS-inspired stuff that, frankly, doesn’t light my fire. It’s a bit like all the additional features of a landlord insurance policy; there’s no harm in them, but you’re really interested in covering the main perils. Yes, auto-save and auto-resume are useful, but I don’t think Apple can hang a full upgrade on those two. There will have to be lots more.
At the same time, with tens of millions of Mac users now accustomed to paying $29 for OS upgrades, do you think they are ready to shell out $100 extra for a single-user copy of 10.7? Talk about being spoiled. It’s also true that Apple exacts only a small part of their revenue from the sale of OS upgrades. Mac OS X is meant as a feature enhancement for Macs, which is what Apple really wants you to buy.
This situation is quite unlike the Windows world, where there are several flavors of Windows, and even though your new PC has the latest version preloaded, it may not be the “lesser” Home Premium version. If you want all the advertised features present and accounted for, prepare to shell out an extra $100 for Ultimate.
Yes, it costs far more to upgrade your Windows box than a Mac. However, Windows power users will generally geek out dealers who offer the “OEM” version, the one allegedly available strictly to manufacturers. But if you’re crafting a home-built PC, technically you’re a manufacturer and thus qualify for pricing that’s far less than what regular consumers pay.
After all is said and done, I expect that Apple will probably not return to the $129 price point for Lion. It’ll be something closer to $79 or $99 a copy, which will simply allow Apple to sell even more copies. But they’ll still prefer that you buy a new Mac, so they can enjoy the full profit experience.
Print This Post
Yes, I paid $30+ for the Public Beta. I justified the purchase as a ticket to see all that hard work from Apple forging the next OS for Macs. Other than 10.1 which came with my Mac purchase, I did not mind paying higher prices for 10.2, 10.3, and 10.4 upgrades. I could definitely see impressive improvements made justifying the upgrade costs. Hard work should be rewarded.
My next Mac purchase came with 10.5. I thought that OS X had finally reached maturity. I don’t recall encountering a kernel panic. A welcome relief to what was occurring on 10.4. The only bugaboo with 10.5 was a backward slide in the Finder’s GUI. In 10.4 if I wanted a window with nice icon placements, it would stay that way permanently. In 10.5, my desired window display has a habit of changing on its own.
So in the past upgrades Apple seemed to make progress by taking two leaps forward and one step back. All I want is Apple to do now is to only take a step forward. I see this in Snow Leopard and in the price of $29. With Lion, maybe it will be $49 for a giant step.
I have found the $179 family pack pricing quite reasonable.
It is $45/machine in our house.
Or 50 cents/week spread out over 2 years.
I am pretty sure I can afford that.
What I think will happen is they will merge iOS and OSX so that the iOS features will include touch, and they will do a swing hinge Macbook air that will be both a full OSX keyboard based computer and a iOS / touch based iPad type device so you don’t have to carry both!
I’ve always found this topic blisteringly stupid, and I’m surprised to see it raise up here.
Nobody wants to pay anyone for anything, but *everybody* expects to GET paid for everything.
Apple charges a fair and reasonable price for a full OS revision, full stop. I spend more than that in a year just getting my oil changed, and a lot more than that for insurance coverage. Keeping your software (INCLUDING the OS) up-to-date is just good hygiene, and far more productive/sensible than following expensive cell-phone fashions.
Buy one less six-pack a week, and you’ll have enough for 10.7 AND a RAM upgrade, too.
I’ve found a great way to avoid paying the upgrade fee … simply purchase a new Mac. 😛
@Partners in Grime, But not the cheapest solution. 🙂
Peace,
Gene
Since Apple owns 10% of the PC market, otherwise known as a rounding error, the worth of Apple’s OS X must necessarily be 10% of the worth of Windows 7. So applying this logic leaves us with the conclusion that Lion should be priced at $5.
ahaa, I’m an Apple’s super funs. believe me.
@zisel, Wouldn’t it be more like 11% the worth of Windows 7 according to that logic? You know, a 1:9 ratio?
[…] What Price Lion? | The Tech Night Owl […]
[…] Much more in the full article here. […]